Image: Internet Archive Book Images · No restrictions · Wikimedia Commons
Food·🏆 Entry of the Week

Twenty-Two Vendors, Eighteen Weeks, and Four Percent of the Farm's Income

LI
Sep 25, 2023 · 3 min read

Our market runs Saturdays from May to September in the parking lot behind the Methodist church, twenty-two vendors in a good week. I have had a table there for nine years. It is the best morning of my week and it is, by my own books, about four percent of what the farm earns.

I say that to people in the local-food world and watch them decide I am doing something wrong. Sometimes I am. But I have now compared notes with enough growers in this county to be confident of the shape: for a farm at this scale, the Saturday market is a shopfront, a marketing channel, and a genuinely lovely social institution, and it is not where the food goes.

Which would be fine, except that for about twenty years the market has been treated as though it were the food system, and an enormous share of the money, energy and political attention available to local agriculture has gone into building more of them.

Consider the arithmetic from the grower's side. Eighteen Saturdays. Four hours of selling, plus two of setup and travel, plus a day of harvest and washing timed for it. Weather risk you carry entirely. A ceiling set by how many people walk through a parking lot, which in a town this size is not a number that responds to anything I do. There is no version of that arrangement that scales, and every grower knows it, and most of us are there anyway because it pays better per pound than anything else and because it is where you meet the person who then buys from you all winter.

The counterargument is real and I would make it myself. The market is where price discovery happens for a small farm — you find out what people will pay for a thing before you plant an acre of it. It is where a new grower can start with one table and no contract. And it does something no wholesale channel does, which is put the person who grew it in front of the person who eats it, which changes both of them. I am not arguing to close anything.

I am arguing that the lever is somewhere else and has been the whole time, and that it is boring, which is why it has never had a photogenic ribbon cutting.

The lever is institutional purchasing. The school district in this county serves something on the order of four thousand meals a day, one hundred and eighty days a year. The hospital has a kitchen. The two nursing homes have kitchens. Those are contracts — volume, known in advance, paid on terms, planted against. One of them would be worth every Saturday I have ever worked.

What stands in the way is not enthusiasm; every one of those institutions has told me they would like to buy locally. It is that their purchasing runs through a distributor with a single invoice and a food-safety certification I do not have, and that no one of us is large enough to fill an order alone. Which means the missing thing is an aggregator — somebody to hold the contract, do the paperwork, and split the order across nine farms.

That is not a market. It is a middleman, and the local-food movement spent two decades teaching everybody that the middleman was the enemy.

I will be at the church lot on Saturday. Somebody will tell me they wish there were more farmers' markets around here, and I will agree with them, because it is a nice thing to say and because I have not yet worked out how to say the other thing in a parking lot.

◉ 141 views

Comments

0